Home

News

Videos

Editorials

Forum

Blog

Activism

Events

Legislation

Contact



TerryCSA

Bio: TerryCSA is co-editor of The Conservative Activist, with a background in business management, accounting, and mental health. She is a wife, mother, and grandmother that refuses to let tyranny rule over her family. As a patriotic American and conservative activist she spends her time educating people about the threat to our freedoms and what role they have in taking America back.


Eye On America
Gene Long
TerryCSA
Steph
John Adams
Art Phillips
Bill Turner
E.A.Timm
Others


*************

I Just Shake My Head
by TerryCSA
December 04, 2009

I look at the news headlines day after day and I just shake my head. I don't ever remember a time when there was so much assinine crap out there. And it comes from the left. It comes from the blacks. It comes from the White House. It comes from Congress.

Where did all these idiots come from? Were they just lying dormant like a fungus growing in the dark, moist underbelly of a rock?

We have a man-child in the White House pretending to be a black guy who hates white people. But he won't mention that he had all the privileges any white kid would envy - private school, Ivy League education, and world traveler.

You have his deranged preacher who thinks it is still 1950 and the white man is the devil. Guess it fills his coffers every week to remind his congregation that they will never rise above victim hood and amount to anything cause "da white man gonna keep 'em down." He sure does give the white man an awful lot of power, doesn't he?

You have the morons from the land of fruits and nuts that don't know the difference between patriotism and racism. And want to put up sex tents on city streets so all the limp wristed perverts, pedophiles, and deviants can have some distorted public display of their sordid lifestyles.

You have the mental midget Howard Dean saying capitalism is dead - long live socialism and there's Nancy Pukelosi doing her jack-in-the-box imitation clapping like some intellectually retarded troglodyte as socialisms new cheerleader.

You have what was once respected so-called journalists acting like raving lunatics with thrills running up their legs at the mention of the long-legged Mac daddy and his finely pressed pants, spouting their vulgarities and attacking children.

Is there no sanity or morality left in this world? Fraud, deceit, and theft reigns supreme. The sad part is so many Americans have accepted it as the norm. They sit there with their brains of jello watching The Simpsons, drinking their 40's of kool-aid, smoking whatever it is they are smoking these days, thinking they have reached nirvana.

It is a sick, sad world that allows this kind of vulgar, idiotic, depravity to disrupt our lives and harm our children.

It almost makes one wish for a total economical collapse for only the fittest will survive. And these morons would be the first to perish because they can't even wipe the drool from their own faces. It is sad, but true. And may be the only saving grace for our once great society.


*************

They ARE Deranged!
by TerryCSA

It is clearly apparent that the mentally deranged have overrun us at every corner. From the White House, politicians in DC., and pretty much the world over.

It is beyond me how people could possibly think that they can control Mother Nature. It is beyond me how on earth people can think that the planet is in a man made warming cycle. The Earth's temperatures have been cooling for a decade now. 23,000 scientists signed a petition decrying global warming as a fraud. Yet these lunatics in DC. want you to believe the opposite is true.

"Propaganda doesn't have to be true. It just has to be repeated often enough."

It is beyond me how people could possibly think that you can spend your way out of debt. Yet our government thinks this is a logical strategy. Every logical thinking person knows you cannot spend more than you make and maintain any symblance of stability.

It is beyond me how people could think socialized medicine is good for everyone. Hitler tried it. It was called gas chambers. But at least his plan didn't cost $2+ trillion dollars. Our government wants to do the same thing on a level that is extremely cruel and subject people to a slow agonizing and terrifying death.

It is beyond me how people can think that nationalizing banking and industry is a good idea. That is the one thing that our Founding Fathers warned against and wrote the Constitution to prevent. Just look to Russia to see how well that works for the average citizen.

It is beyond me how people can think it is okay to accept, normalize, and force deviant behavior and beliefs on everyone, while demonizing family values and morals.

The world has gone mad! Where did these people come from? What happened to their ability to think logically? How on earth did these mentally deranged people survive in life as long as they have? And how on earth did we allow them to attain positions of power?

The madness has to stop!


*************

When are we going to say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
by TerryCSA

Obama and his thugs are telling people who to hate and it is US, American Patriots, ie: white people. they have painted us as the violent right wing extremist racist, but who is commiting the violence?

Obozo tells his minion to punch back twice as hard and the following day a townhall attendee is severely beaten by SEIU thugs.

30 black youth attack a white family in their own yard on the 4th of July, beating the father so severely he spent a week in the hospital, and attack his wife and daughter while screaming "It's a black world now!".

A white youth is beaten by black attackers on a school bus.

An 80 yr old woman is shoved up against a wall and choked by an SEIU thug at a townhall meeting.

Tea partiers in Florida brutally beaten by pro-amnesty group. See video:

The list is endless and growing more so day by day.

They have turned our peaceful and legal protests into violent forays and all with the blessing of the Obama administration.

Just how much more of this are we going to take? At what point are we going to stop turning the other cheek?

I am mad as hell and I have had just about enough. They want us to become violent. Well, becareful of what you ask for. That's what my momma always told me.

In Arizona Tea Party attendees wearing their lawful sidearms appeared to get their attention and scared them to death. Maybe it is time for a massive Tea Party of gun owners wearing their sidearms. Do they really want to take on such a group with their chicken sh*t attacks on the elderly, unarmed, and defenseless? I would think not.

But if they are that stupid - Bring it on!

Obozo and his thugs with the useful idiots in MSM are pushing this country to the brink of a civil war. I hope they are prepared to lose.


*************

Welcome To TYRANNY!
by TerryCSA
November 08, 2009

Throughout my lifetime I have, on more than one occasion, been angered and dismayed at the actions of our government, but never more than I am now.

We have spoken and spoken loudly. We have protested en masse. We have signed petitions, sent emails and faxes to our "public servants". We have made phone calls and personal appearances to our elected officials offices. We have made our wishes well known. And they have responded with a resounding, "SCREW YOU!"

The House past their monstrous healthcare bill through collusion. Threats, strong-arm tactics and back room deals. This was not democracy in action. It was TYRANNY. Hear that word well. It is what our elected officials now firmly believe in, what they practice, and what they will subject We, the People, to.

The Dems are touting that this bill will cut the deficit by $100 billion. The CBO says the bill will cost $1.2 Trillion. Now when I was an accountant that left a deficit of $1.1 Trillion. Their words don't add up. Or maybe it is what they are not saying that adds up.

In a time of 10.2% unemployment congress has committed the biggest act of Treason ever perpetrated on the American people. This illegal and UNCONSTITUTIONAL bill will be borne on the backs of the American people to the tune of $1.1 Trillion in increased taxes and reduced benefits of $100 billion. This bill will not only kill jobs, it will make criminals out of honest, hard working Americans. It will deny benefits to our most needy individuals - our elders and our little ones. It will defer money along racial lines. It will grow government to a level never before seen in any country in the world.

The government couldn't run the Bunny Ranch (a house of ill-repute) and now they will show how inept they are at running our economy. This is a takeover of 1/6th of our economy. This is a takeover and control of the lives of the American people. This is the death knell of Freedom.

It is apparent that absolute government control and destruction of our country is their agenda. It is fully apparent that enslaving the American people is their goal. The will of the people is insignificant. Our Redress of Grievances have been ignored. They are pushing the American people in a direction we had hoped we would not have to go.

We have very few chances of derailing this fast track to Tyranny. But they are, still yet, the avenues we must travel. We must FIGHT BACK with every fiber of our being. We must fight like our lives depend on it, because it does, as well as those of our children and grandchildren.

It is time to start picking them off one by one. Everyone that voted for this bill has committed Treason. It is time to start filing ethics charges against each and every one of them. It is time we wage a War of Distractions against those that wish to destroy our people and our country.

ACT NOW! or forever live and die on your knees in subservience to TYRANNY.


*************

House Passes HealthCare Bill
219 Dems 1 RINO
by TerryCSA
November 08, 2009


Joseph Cau (R-LA) was the lone Republican vote.

Anh "Joseph" Cao, Louisiana's 2nd Congressional District Representative, was born in Saigon (now Ho Chi Minh City), Vietnam.

As he prepared for priesthood, his faith was strong. However, his confidence in government's ability to care for those in need weakened by the day. Before long, Joseph ended his quest for priesthood in a personal crusade for social justice.

In 2007, Governor Jindal appointed Joseph Cao to help ensure fair voting as a member of the Board of Elections for Orleans Parish. He was also elected to lead the Louisiana Republican Party both on the parish and state levels. And earlier this year Joseph Cao was elected delegate to the Republican National Convention.


Please, oh please, tell me how this person garnered the RNC nomination? Oh wait! The RNC stands for "RINO's 'n Collusion".

This has got to stop! The infiltration of foreign born Socialist/Marxist into our political system must stop. It is time to expand the "Natural Born Citizenship" requirement to all our politicians. This is the United States of America, not little Vietnam, or Austria, or Kenya.

It is time to demand that the RNC either strictly adhere to Republican based conservative principles and nominate candidates accordingly, or dissolve the RNC, to be replaced by the Conservative Party.

It is time to stop allowing our government to run rough shod over We, the People.

They are OUR employees! And they need to be fired and criminally prosecuted for treason against the State.

It's time to get fired up! Everything up till now was a test run. Now the game is on and we are up to bat.

It is time to let them know they need to start updating their resume's because they are going to be on the unemployment line.


*************

Ideology of the Communist Manifesto - Part I
by TerryCSA
October 26, 2009

To defeat thy enemy one must know how they think, what they believe, and how they intend to implement their battle plan. Everyone needs to read the Communist Manifesto, the bible of the Marxist. They have set their entire platform out in this document. I will attempt to dissect this document and insert some commentary as to how obscene and asinine the thinking of the leftist/socialist/Marxist/communist is, not to mention downright dangerous.

Ch.1 Bourgeois and Proletarians
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.

Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other - bourgeoisie and proletariat.


Doers vs. Takers
Capitalism vs. Entitlement
Right vs. Left


Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

Thanks to Modern Industry the working class has been able to leave the toils of meager existence and elevate themselves, based on their own aspirations, to levels of subsistence that the communist ideologues don't want to earn, but think they are entitled to.

The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors", and has left no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous "cash payment".

In other words, the Capitalist preferred to pay a man wages for his labor in lieu of enslaving him.

The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigour in the Middle Ages, which reactionaries so much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence. It has been the first to show what man's activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former exoduses of nations and crusades.

And this is a bad thing? Let's see, we have automobiles for faster transportation, modern medical advances that saves lives, advancements in agriculture that feeds an ever increasing population, developed utility grids to bring the people out of the dark, developed communication i.e.; radio, TV, computers, internet, to aid people in expanding their education of local and world events, invented modern appliances to preserve and cook our food. All the while each invention led to an increase in opportunities for more people to improve their own lives with more opportunities at employment at increasingly better wages than scratching the soil for mere subsidence.

The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian nations into civilization.

So, according to communist ideologues, the world should be barbaric? We shouldn't influence the evolution of third world countries to a more prosperous society with better living conditions for all those who are willing to do more than live a sufferable and indignant life?

The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it forces the barbarians' intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.

So by advancements in technology at our expense we are forcing others to improve their lives, living condition, health, and safety. We are forcing them to want more than live a disparaging, death-ridden existence of disease and ignorance.

The bourgeoisie has subjected the country to the rule of the towns. It has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life.

I do believe the "rule of towns" is called "Sovereignty " and individualism, two things the Marxist/communist is against. If these two things exist then the communist ruling class cannot exert absolute power. Which is what communism is all about - absolute power and control over the minions. Yes, Marxism/communism is a class society. Ruling elite vs. an enslaved society.

The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself.

But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons - the modern working class - the proletarians.


The proletarians - the unions, SEIU, AFL-CIO, UAW, oh and let's not forget the criminal organization ACORN.

In proportion as the bourgeoisie, i.e., capital, is developed, in the same proportion is the proletariat, the modern working class, developed- a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital. These laborers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market.

It would seem, according to Marxist/communist ideology, that man should not work, at least not for himself. What they can't seem to comprehend is that if man doesn't work nothing is produced and slavery produces inferior products.

If the farmer doesn't till the soil there is no food to feed his family.
If the rancher doesn't raise livestock there is no meat to feed his family, no leather goods for shoes, no milk to drink.
If the cotton farmer or sheepherder don't produce their products there is no cotton or wool for making fabric.
Without fabric the tailor cannot make clothes. The weaver cannot make blankets.

Without work man cannot improve his condition above the hungry, naked, freezing barbarian. Man would cease to exist, Bourgeois and Proletarian, capitalist and communist.


*************

Ideology of the Communist Manifesto - Part II
by TerryCSA
October 28, 2009

Ch.1 Bourgeois and Proletarians con't.
The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labor, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labor of men superseded by that of women. Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labor, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex.

Communism is sexist. Their complaint being that women can now do the same work as men. Women can now earn wages and support themselves without being beholden to or subservient to men. Although at the time Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto most women didn't work outside of the home and for those that did their wages were less than men. The fact that in this day and age this is still part of their manifesto indicates that men are superior to women. The second complaint that age determines wages is another example of their unwillingness to reward the man that has spent his life learning and perfecting his skills. Once again the ideology is to punish the achiever and reward the sloth.

No sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer, so far at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portion of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc.

The ideology that one should be responsible for ones own life is foreign to the Marxist. Their irrational belief that everything in life should be free has led us to the state we are in today. Welfare is based in communist ideology. Free rent, free food, freedom to gluttonously consume resources at the expense of others. The man that receives everything for free has no respect or worth, nor does he respect or place worth on human life. The man who receives everything for free is at the mercy of his provider - the communist ruling elite- to be used as his minions, his slaves, his army or mindless drones.

The proletariat goes through various stages of development. With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie. At first, the contest is carried on by individual laborers, then by the work of people of a factory, then by the operative of one trade, in one locality, against the individual bourgeois who directly exploits them. They direct their attacks not against the bourgeois condition of production, but against the instruments of production themselves; they destroy imported wares that compete with their labor, they smash to pieces machinery, they set factories ablaze, they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages.

It is easier to destroy than to achieve. To restore by force the status of man to the Middle Ages is to forcefully regress every person to a state of oppression, of slavery, of barbarian. This statement is reflected in the current Climate Reform (Cap and Trade) legislation which would ultimately return society to the Dark Ages.

This organization of the proletarians into a class, and, consequently, into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves. But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself.

This paragraph, with the two preceding it, which due to space limitations are not included here, I'll leave that for you to read yourself, talks of the formation of unions. The union's origination in Marxism/communism is evident and they are growing stronger into a political party. We only have to look at our current administration to see just how much a part of the political system they are and how Marxist the current administration is. Unions are a subversive group and in their current state are now the Capitalists that they have propagandized against, since they now run GM.

The "dangerous class", the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of the old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.

This refers to the very portion of society of which the Marxist/communist has created through social programming and bigotry. They have created an "entitlement" class to be used as a tool. The mindless minions that don't think for themselves, but do the bidding of their taskmasters - the left, liberals, unions (all Marxist/communists).

All the preceding classes that got the upper hand sought to fortify their already acquired status by subjecting society at large to their conditions of appropriation. The proletarians cannot become masters of the productive forces of society, except by abolishing their own previous mode of appropriation, and thereby also every other previous mode of appropriation. They have nothing of their own to secure and to fortify; their mission is to destroy all previous securities for, and insurances of, individual property.

In other words, if they can't have it for free because they have this immature and irrational sense of entitlement, then noone can have it, except the State, the ruling class, the communist elite.

All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority. The proletariat, the lowest stratum of our present society, cannot stir, cannot raise itself up, without the whole super incumbent strata of official society being sprung into the air.

The communist ideology is based on the exploitation of minorities and the brainwashing of said minorities into believing the Marxist has their best interest at heart, by making the minority beholden to them, by using them as the disruptors of society. This has never been more evident than in our own past election process.

Though not in substance, yet in form, the struggle of the proletariat with the bourgeoisie is at first a national struggle. The proletariat of each country must, of course, first of all settle matters with its own bourgeoisie.

In depicting the most general phases of the development of the proletariat, we traced the more or less veiled civil war, raging within existing society, up to the point where that war breaks out into open revolution, and where the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie lays the foundation for the sway of the proletariat.


Overthrow the government through infiltration. Overthrow all governments by the same methodology. Establish world control. A One-World Government.

Hitherto, every form of society has been based, as we have already seen, on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes. But in order to oppress a class, certain conditions must be assured to it under which it can, at least, continue its slavish existence. The serf, in the period of serfdom, raised himself to membership in the commune, just as the petty bourgeois, under the yoke of the feudal absolutism, managed to develop into a bourgeois. The modern laborer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the process of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class. He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth. And here it becomes evident that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an overriding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie; in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.

And there it is in a nutshell. In order to enslave all the system of capitalism must be destroyed. It is that system of capitalism that promotes freedom and hope for every human being. As long as there is freedom and hope the Marxist cannot establish control.


*************

From the Plantation to the White House
by TerryCSA
October 09, 2009

Michelle Obama has traced her roots back to a little slave girl in the 1850's. That little girl turns out to be her great-great-great grandmother. The story goes that this little girl, Melvinia, was sold for $475 (quite a sum for a girl) and eventually got pregnant by some "white guy" (Michelle's great-great-great grandfather) as a teenager.

From slavery to First Lady. From plantation to the White House. Quite a leap for a woman who hated her country. "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." The same country that allowed her great-grandfather to be a homeowner in 1900 and successful business owner in 1911. The same country that allowed her father to become a Democratic precinct captain, in Chicago. The same country that allowed her brother to become a big time football coach. The same company that allowed her to enter the White House without wearing a maids uniform.

My, oh my, how down trodden Michelle's family has been since slavery. From slave girl to being able to afford the educations of Princeton and Harvard Law. How horrible her country has been for her. And even worse, she has a cousin who is a rabbi. Maybe he is why Barry hates jews.

Obama said both she and her husband believed "that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond, and you do what you say you're going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don't know them, and even if you don't agree with them."

Hmmm... and just where does that pertain to the Obamas life? Nowhere. Neither has worked hard or earned anything. And Heaven forbid you disagree with them unless you want that 3 am. knock at your door from the men in black.

In just five generations she has attained the American Dream. But she has come no further personally than that ignorant, illiterate little slave girl. (All sarcasm intended).

Now we have a TOTUS and First Lady that both come from bi-racial backgrounds, yet, they are two of the most rascist, American haters in our country. Not to mention the biggest hypocrites in the world. Frauds, fakes, phonies, deceivers, and down right liars.


*************

Why are Liberals such angry, vile people?

As liberals go around touting "We Won!", they act more like sore losers. The anger in their vile rhetoric directed towards conservatives is somewhat mystifying.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they can no longer play the victim of morality, since morality no longer exists.

I have been pondering their anger for some time now and it is starting to make sense... maybe. They are unruly teenagers who act out because they expect discipline. Now just think about this and follow along.

An unruly teenager breaks the rules when he knows there are consequences for his actions. He stays out past curfew, skips school, etc. He knows if he is caught, which he hopes he will be, that he will be punished. He expects to be punished. He needs to be punished. It is his way of reassuring himself that his parents care about what he does and his personal well-being. He knows someone cares about him. If he is not punished then he continues escalating his unruly behavior until someone cares enough about him to stop him. This fulfills a dual need. The need to feel love and the need to play the victim. He can play the victim in front of his peers because he was punished for bad behavior. Since his peers are like minded they can commiserate with him. Thus he gets a false sense of acceptance. In essence his bad behavior is awarded with unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization.

This scenario explains the Garofalo's of the world who spew vile hatred. There is nobody who cares enough about her to punish her. So her anger continues and the consequences of her actions are elusive. She receives acceptance from her peers but, she needs to be the victim. And without consequences and punishment she cannot fulfill the need for unconditional love nor can she play that one role she craves - victim. So her anger grows and her vile spews forth.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". They know they have bad judgement and the safety net of someone stopping them from hurting themselves suddenly developed a large hole. Now they have no one to blame but themselves for what they have done. Yet their anger is deflected onto conservatives for not stopping them. They didn't really want to win. They wanted to be the victim and to blame the "racists" for their loss. They can't. They won.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they feel ashamed, humiliated. "Why isn't everyone coming to my party?" It's like the child that so wants to be liked by everybody, yet nobody shows up for her birthday party. And it's all Bush's fault. She is angry and lashes out at everyone around her because not everybody wants to be her friend. The libs are lashing out at the conservatives because we won't celebrate their victory. They don't understand this isn't the Academy Awards and Obozo isn't Denzel Washington.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Slowly their blinders are being removed and they see what a horrible mistake they made. They were duped and they are scared. Scared because they are responsible. Responsibility is not what liberals want. They don't understand the concept and can't handle it. Now they have to find someone to blame to deflect the blame from themselves.

It's Bush's fault.
It's Rush Limbaugh's fault.
It's the "racist" conservatives fault.
It's everybodies fault but their own.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they have nothing to protest. The conservatives are having "Tea Party's" and since it wasn't their idea they are not going to attend. The libs want to be the center of attention and we have stolen their thunder. They never expected us to take to the streets and upstage them. And once again we show them how childish and immature they are. We don't have need to smash windows, scream vulgarities at our opponents, or assault little old ladies to make our point. We are the adults and they are the children. Our objective doesn't require consequences and punishment. Yet, the liberals don't understand that. Our objective doesn't require unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization. Yet, the liberals do not understand that. It befuddles their mind that anyone would peaceably express their views in order to sway public opinon. That's just not how it is done in their liberal minds. So they must attack.

Their mindset is attack-react. In their mind when they are attacked, they react violently. They expect the same from conservatives. Afterall, we are just uneducated, bible clinging, gun toting, racist goobers who meet in the woods. How difficult should it be to get a reaction from such neanderthal types. It is irrational to them that someone of such low standing could exhibit such control, such poise, such maturity. So they continue with their vile denigration of what they know not.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Because they have underestimated the power that is not theirs - the conservative voice. They have awakened the slumbering giant and they have no defenses against him. The Hounds of Hell (liberals) will be squashed beneath his mighty fist. This is what the liberals want. To be punished so they may go back to playing the victim. The role they cherish so much.

"The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term "liberals" are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They do not want to accept the full meaning of their goal; they want to keep all the advantages and effects of capitalism, while destroying the cause, and they want to establish statism without its necessary effects. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery". - Ayn Rand


*************

Is This War Winnable?

Islam is not a religion of peace. Most religions operate under the premise of peace, "love thy neighbor", "turn the other cheek", "respect all living things", but not Islam. Islam operates under the premise "submit or die". It is the directive of the Quran that peace can only exist when the whole world submits to Allah and those that don't submit to Allah must die.

The war against Al Queda and the Taliban is not merely a war against terror. It is a religious war, a jihad, declared by the Muslim nation. This is not a war we are use to conducting or fighting, one in which the army that has the greatest strength wins out over its' enemy. The object of war is not to annihilate an entire people, but to convince an oppressor through the show of force, to stop their oppressive behavior and reach a cohesive agreement. The object of a jihad is to annihilate all non-muslims. Period! There is no compromise. There is no agreement. There is only death.

Until we (non-muslims) wrap our heads around this concept of jihad, and face the fact that we must fight this war on their terms, two things will result:

      1) We will not win this war,
      2) We will all die.


This is not about stopping a rag tag band of nut jobs that are content with blowing up a few buildings. This is about our very survival. This is about life or death. Until we step out of our comfort zone and realize the truth of what is happening in the world we will be signing our own death warrant.

Unless you are willing to worship a false God, live in poverty and squalor in a tent, live in subservience, then we need to fight on their terms.

      All or nothing.
      Muslims vs. All of mankind.
      Life or Death.


*************

Setting Black Americans Back 150 Years
Part 1

"Judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character." Martin Luther King has been touted as the greatest spokesman of all time representing the black race. These words he spoke are the most notable. Yet, 95% of the black people in this country and a good portion of the rest failed to heed them on November 4, 2008.

95% of the black folks allowed their own racist ideology to guide them in one of the most important privileges afford to the American people. The right to vote. They wanted a black man as POTUS. They discredited MLK's wisdom and most profound statement - "Judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character."

There was a time, two generations ago, that if you had asked if a black man could be POTUS the question would have been met with a roar of laughter. Time had changed a lot of the way people perceived one another, at least for the white community. Apparently the same was not true in the black community.

The majority of those that voted for Obama admittedly did so because of the color of his skin. Swept up in the "historic moment" of it all, they failed to judge the content of his character. They failed to extend due diligence in exercising their right to vote. They failed to listen to his words because they refused to look past the color of his skin. For as much as his election appeared to be a "win" for the black race it is ultimately their biggest failure. A failure that through Obama's own words and actions will set race relations and the black community back 150 years. His racist rhetoric is destroying all the advancement we, as a people, have made. His racist rhetoric is placing a great divide among the people of the United States. That is his plan. And it is not a winning formula for the black race, or the people of the United States of America.

-TerryCSA


*************

Setting Black Americans Back 150 Years
Part 2

Once again the black race has fallen victim to their own. Originally sold into slavery by their own brothers, now being returned to it by Obama.

Black people seem be content to play the role of victim. It makes me ask some very poignant questions. Is freedom and the responsibility that comes with it more than they care to endure? Are they so bonded to their African identity that they prefer slavery over freedom? Was the civil rights act, affirmative action, lowering of scholastic testing, more responsibility than they were willing to accept?

These are not racist remarks, but serious questions. The tenacity with which they hold to selective portions of history. The way they form it to suit their needs of the moment. How easily they are led by the false rhetoric of a few radicals who only wish to create chaos, confusion, and a contrived anger in order to elevate their own personas along with their pocketbooks. The Farrakhans, the Sharptons, the Jacksons, and the Wrights of the world play on the naiveté and immaturity of the Obamas of the world.

They have indoctrinated Obama and the black race with their hate and their perception that they are owed certain privileges. Their Marxist ideology, aided by the Cloward-Piven theory, of destroying America by using their own people to act as the catalyst. By erroneously teaching them; that they don't have to work; they are entitled to free housing, free food, free money, free health care, free electricity, free cars, free tuition, preferential treatment in placement in colleges, preferential treatment in the workforce, and preferential treatment in life and that they can take advantage of everything given to them. All this does nothing to free them from their ill-perceived bondage. This only enslaves them more, more to the stereotypes that had existed for so long of the slovenly, drugged out, drunken, criminals.

Obama is only furthering to incite such stereotypes as he continues his "spread the wealth around" rhetoric. Throughout his campaign he convinced black people he was going to do for them, he was going to right all the wrongs of the past. The only thing he has done is advance the stereotype of the criminality of the black race by:

-allowing two Black Panthers get away with civil rights violations. Is that advancing the black race? Or is it further instilling in them it is okay to be a criminal?,

-supporting a criminal organization run by black people called ACORN. Is that advancing the black race? Or is it teaching them it is okay to commit fraud and abuse?,

-his staff stating, "No white construction workers need apply" when referring to the stimulus money. Is that advancing the black race? Or is it teaching them it is okay to be judged by the color of your skin and not by the content of your character?

The list is endless as to Obamas racially divisive rhetoric. His intent is not to elevate the black race, but to elevate his own position of power at the expense of the black race.

-TerryCSA


*************

Setting Black Americans Back 150 Years
Part 3

"A black man can't manage a Waffle House. What makes you think he can manage the White House?"

"You can't give a black man a position of authority because he lacks the ability to prioritize his responsibilities."

"A black man is incapable of accepting responsibility so we must have welfare to take care of the responsibilities he will not."

"The black man is incapable of learning as well as their white counterparts, so we must lower the scholastic aptitude tests so they can appear to achieve the same scores."

"We must have racial quotas in the work place because blacks are incapable of getting or maintaining a job on their own. They don't have the motivation or the desire to develop a good work ethic so we must make sure there is a reason for an employer to keep them."

Now, pray tell me, what part of those stereotypes, trumpeted mostly by left wing liberals, has Obama broken? None. How many has he reinforced? Just about all of them.

Obama was "given" his current job because of the color of his skin. He has failed miserably at managing the White House, with over 500 staff and cabinet positions left unfilled after 8 months on the job. He has not handled the responsibilities of his position. He doesn't understand simple money management.

Obama and his family have become the largest welfare recipients in the United States. They squander money that does not belong to them. $787 billion Stimulus bill that is rife with fraud, earmarks, and abuse. $400 billion Omnibus bill that was pure pork. He and his wife apparently must take separate planes with full entourage for each on overseas junkets that his wife has no need to go on except to play tourist and go on shopping sprees. Their weekly parties with big name entertainers and serving $100 lb. Wagu beef, Iranian caviar, and Iranian wine. That's a lot of food stamps. It is irresponsible, immature, and downright theft.

He has ordered congress to hire black "Chiefs of Staff" because he believes Capital Hill is "too white". He believes people are incapable of taking care of themselves so "government" must mandate their needs and enforce their compliance. Sound a bit like slavery? While his management skills falter young American men and women are dying in a foreign country because he is incapable of making a simple decision. While he reaps the benefits of all that has been "given" to him, he is destroying everything the black man has gained and reinforcing every stereotype of the black man.

It is apparent that although he may have attended prestigious universities he was incapable of learning so much as basic economics or developing basic management skills. One would wonder if the evidence of his lack of basic skills would be revealed in his scholastic records, the ones he has conveniently had sealed.

So tell me just where he has advanced the black race. Nowhere, as far as I can see. He has insured by his ineptitude that it will be a long time before another black man assumes the level of power and authority he has been "given".

Since he chose himself as the example of the typical black man he has said to the world, "The black man is incapable of properly handling authority. The black man is incapable of due diligence in his responsibilities. The black man is not intelligent enough to make the required management decisions."

Even though we know there were many better-qualified black candidates for the position of POTUS than Obama, because of Obamas ineptitude they may never get to prove the exemplary abilities they may possess.

How far back will Obama set the black race and race relations in this country by the time he is done? Time will tell. Can the course be reversed? Yes. But how long it will take depend on the true leaders of the black community, and that is not the Farrakhans, or Sharptons, or Jacksons, or Wrights of the world. It will take true leaders, ones that see that for the black race to succeed all people must succeed. For America to succeed, we must all BE Americans, un-hyphenated. Next time, maybe, they'll put forth a Man of substance as a candidate instead of an immature, self-centered, little boy.

-TerryCSA


*************


Libyan Dictator Quaddafi Calls Obama "Our Son"

After hearing reports from the UN meeting one can only surmise that America is some serious trouble. From the admittance that Obama is a muslim (which we already knew) to his view of a World Government with World Laws and World enforcement.

Obamas statement that it is time for the world to know that treaties will be enforced. Those treaties include the UN Gun Ban Treaty and the Rights of The Child treaty to just name a couple of the most devastating to our Republic and our families. The media is focusing on "climate control" but behind closed doors these two treaties are the ones the UN have been pushing hard on the U.S.

Quaddafi's speech made the hair stand up on the back of my neck. When he said that they couldn't be assured that any future president of the U.S. would uphold Obama's views and that he would prefer to see Obama remain leader for life. That would be the end of America as we know it and we would be just another third world country under tyranical rule.

Everything that is coming into play is setting the stage for Obama to stay in power. Financial crisis, nationalization of banking, industry, etc., a man made "pandemic" scare, lowering of our military defenses, the funding of Hamas with American tax payer dollars, and opening the door for a terrorist attack. All of which lead to a declaration of "martial law", which would allow him to remain in power indefinately.

If all of this doesn't open your eyes and scare the bejeebers out of you then you just don't care about freedom, about your country, about your family, children and grandchildren.

If this does scare you then it is time for you to get involved, get vocal, get active, and get prepared for the worst.

- TerryCSA


*************


Forced Vaccinations Of Medical Personnel

According to a report from KWQC-TV (Davenport,Iowa) Quad City hospitals make flu shots mandatory. If an employee does not have a medical reason and refuses to get the flu shot there will be consequences. In the most extreme case it will be termination.

Is this the first step towards forced vaccinations for everybody? Scientists and virologist have noted that H1N1 is no more deadly or widespread than your average flu. See What to do If You Are Forced to Take Swine Flu Shot. The fearmonging of a pandemic perpetrated by the WHO, U.N., and U.S. government is for ulterior motives. They have perpetrated a fraud against the people, not only of the United States, but the world at-large.

A UN report says pandemic may result in anarchy unless western world pays for antiviral drugs and vaccines. The western world means us. Is this extortion?

Homeland security and FEMA are pushing for forced vaccinations. They have links with the vaccine manufacturers via political contacts. A great deal of money will be made by the manufacturers, should forced vaccinations be mandated.

Naturally, vaccine manufacturers have been in a competitive battle to produce the first vaccine. The main contenders have been Baxter Pharmaceuticals and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Both of these companies have had agreements with the World Health Organization to produce a pandemic vaccine.

The Baxter company has been associated with two deadly scandals. The first event occurred in 2006 when hemophiliac components were contaminated with HIV virus and injected in tens of thousands of people, including thousands of children. Baxter continued to release the HIV contaminated vaccine even after the contamination was known.

The second event occurred recently when it was discovered that Baxter had released a seasonal flu vaccine containing the bird flu virus, which would have produced a real world pandemic, to 18 countries. Fortunately, astute lab workers in the Czech Republic discovered the deadly combination and blew the whistle before a worldwide disaster was unleashed.

It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations-everybody pays.

A virologist was quoted as saying, "Where the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know." Extensive analysis of the virus found that it contained the original 1918 H1N1 flu virus, the avian flu virus (bird flu), and two new H3N2 virus genes from Eurasia. Debate continues over the possibility that swine flu is a genetically engineered virus.

So what do we have here - a man made manufactured virus, government involvement with drug manufacturers, request for more FEMA camps, a cadre of coffins in secluded locations throughout the U.S. and Canada, ads for military personnel to apply for internment camp jobs, and Obama and his thugs waiting (or staging) a "crisis" to issue martial law. Massachusetts and Maine are already introducing legislation in their respective states for forced vaccinations, quarantines, and forced entry into private homes. The staging of a precedent for Obama with the backing of the U.N. to institute martial law.

One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself-at least by conventional medicine. See Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu. There are much safer ways to protect oneself from this flu virus, such as higher doses of vitamin D3, selective immune enhancement using supplements, and a good diet.

-TerryCSA


*************


The U.N. Is Out to Get Your Gun Again

Wake up and smell the coffee folks, for the pot is burning.

In 2006 the U.N. tried to push their attrocious gun ban treaty at their annual conference. Thanks to the NRA and its members, along with fellow patriots they abandoned their effort due to strong opposition.

Guess what? They're back! and this time Obama, the staunch anti-gunner, (backed by Soros, Podesta, and Holder) is chairing the U.N. conference.

This treaty is not getting any air time. But, do not think it has gone away. Why do you think Soros spent so much money getting Obama elected? To push forward his agenda, and a major portion of his agenda is disarming the American people. Only then can he go forward with his plan of globalization and the destruction of the United States. This isn't conspiracy theory. Soros has openly avowed to do just that.

Now his little bought and paid for monkey-on-a-string will see his plan to fruition. What can we do? I'm afraid this time absolutely nothing. Signing a U.N. Treaty does not require the consent of the American people.

But enforcing it does!

I dug out a couple of articles regarding the 2006 conference. It would behoove every American to read them and be prepared.

This will be the spark.

And the flame will be the UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD.

Connect the dots people. It is not coicidence that the CRC is a UN agenda.

They know they will have a revolution when they institute a total gun ban. They also know the one thing that is nearest and dearest to us are our children. They will attempt to quell and control us through the control of our children.

Do not be mistaken. This is not the first time in history this has been done successfully. Let me tell you a little history that you won't find in your fat little old white mans history books.

When the white man (spanish, french, english) came to this land the first thing they did was capture indians and make slaves of them. They were the FIRST slaves in this country, not blacks. Now, unlike the Africans. Indians weren't sold into slavery. What happened was the invaders would walk into an Indian community, grab the first child they saw and chop off the childs arm. Then they threatened the adults that if they didn't come with them they would kill all the children. The invaders were very successful with this tactic in the beginning.

Now they are refining their process through legal means. No, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I just know a bit about history and corrupt human nature.

Go to the following links and read for yourself. Draw your own conclusions.

Then start sounding the warning bell.

ParentalRights.org
MONITORING THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD

Firearms First
U.N. Gun Ban Scheduled for July 4th

LaPierre: The U.N. Is Out to Get Your Gun

Here is an excerpt from the last link:

LaPierre said, "Everything they, those at the U.N., do is to take guns away from law abiding citizens throughout the world and give guns only to the governments of the world."

He explained, "In U.N.-speak, a legal gun is a government gun, an illicit gun is a non-government gun. And that means individual citizens and it also means any freedom fighter that is opposing some genocidal government."

LaPierre answered, "I think this is probably the biggest long-term threat to the second amendment down the road. They're dead serious about doing this".

LaPierre went on to say, "The sad thing is, the U.N. philosophy is about governments. They don't think about individual rights. They don't think about individual freedoms. And there's not one of those countries coming to that conference that has a Bill of Rights like the U.S. does."

Doocy added, "Here in the United States, when we've got a problem, we say, 'Call your congressman.' But when you're dealing with the U.N., there's no one you can contact . . ."

"No. They want to be a global nanny. They want to give a global permission slip. They don't think in terms of individual rights, self-defense, privacy," said LaPierre. "They think in terms of global registry, data banks, surveillance systems, and ultimately giving all guns to the government and leaving honest people totally defenseless."

Get ready people!


*************


You Are A Racist If...

The rhetoric coming from the White House and the liberal leftis starting to sound like a Jeff Foxworthy comedy skit, only not nearly as funny. But, ridiculously humorous on a moronic level.

You are a Racist if…
…you disagree with Obozos policies.
…you oppose government take over of banks in violation of the Constitution.
…you oppose government take over of private industry in violation of the Constitution.
…you oppose the tripling of our national debt.
…you oppose the massive expansion of government.
…you oppose Cap and Trade, a massive tax on the American people.
…you oppose ObamaCare, the largest power grab of 1/6 of our economy and a devastating tax on the American people.
…you oppose the appointment of 40+ czars (self proclaimed communists) not confirmed by Congress in violation of the Constitution.
…you oppose out of control spending.
…you oppose the strong arm tactics, thugocracy, and interference into local legal matters by Obozos thugs.
…you oppose the actions of Obozo in his support of world dictators.
…you oppose the alienation and abandonment of our foreign allies.
…you oppose he who fraudulently ascended to the presidency with the help of his co-conspirators, Pelosi and Dean.
…you oppose the corruption and coercion of our court systems by Obozos thugs.
…you oppose the dismantling of our Constitution.
…you oppose federal control.

You are a Racist if…
…you exercise your 1st Amendment Right of freedom of speech by opposing Obozos policies and actions.
…you believe in the 2nd Amendment to insure the 1st Amendment.
…you believe in God.
…you believe in our Constitution.
…you believe in family values and morals.
…you believe in hard work and personal responsibility.
…you believe in States Rights and Sovereignty.
…you believe in the Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
…you believe in the Republic that our Founding Fathers fought and died for.
…you believe that parents should raise their children and not the U.N.
…you believe illegal means just that - illegal, and should be treated as such.
…you believe in the Right to private property.
…you believe this is the greatest country in the world and refuse to allow its destruction.

I am a Racist simply because I did not vote for a fraud, a fool. a Marxist, a thief, and a liar.

-TerryCSA


*************


Turbulent Times...Troublesome Times

Never before have our freedoms and the Republic been under such constant attack from within. We have allowed our country and its' control to slip into radical socialist hands. And, it was accomplished right under our nose.

The warning signs were there, have been for decades. There were those sounding the warning bell. But we blew them off as tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists. We were too sensible...too resonable to believe that such evil intentions existed within our own government and institutions. How could we have been so wrong?

Benjamin Franklin warned us. When asked if we now had a monarchy or a republic, Ben replied, "Republic! If you can keep it."

Now the question isn't "can we keep it?", but "can we restore it?" Our Constitution has been amended and bastardized beyond recognition and far beyond what the founding fathers had intended. Legislation has been written so cryptically that an entire team of lawyers cannot decipher what our legislators don't even bother to read. Thus leaving laws open to interpretation giving judges the leeway to legislate from the bench, in direct violation of the Constitution. Who's writing these bills if our elected officials aren't reading them and even lawyers can't understand them?

The Obama administration and the 111th Congress have succeeded in passing some of the most massive spending-pork barrel legislation in our history, along with some of the most immoral, freedom grabbing laws ever. And they aren't done yet.

I'm angry, angrier than I have ever been in my life. I'm watching everything I believed in, everything I worked for, and everything I raised my children/grandchildren to believe in and work for taken away by the stroke of a socialist pen.

I'm angry that our elected officials are not doing what we elected them to do, what they swore an Oath to do - uphold the Constitution!

I'm angry that our elected officials are not getting vocal, loud, and aggressive in performing the job we "hired" them to do. If they behaved in the private sector the way they do in the public sector they would be standing in the unemployment line.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) says if we are expecting our elected officials to do something to save our country from socialist tyranny we are waiting in futility. He says it is up to the American people. As much as I like Sen. DeMint and appreciate his honesty, his statements add to my anger.

What in the Sam Hell did we elect these people to do?!!!! Short of an armed rebellion, what are we suppose to do? Our elected officials are not listening to us. They have forgotten we are their employers. They are not acting as we wish them to. We, the American people, do not propose legislation, nor do we get to vote on it. So, just tell me what are we suppose to do? Vote? 2010 elections are a long way away and you can bet your sweet bippy we are going to vote. But, an awful lot of damage can be done to our Constitution, our government, our freedoms, and our election system by then. So, again I ask, what do we do?

We can attend Tea Parties, protest marches, town hall meetings, waive signs, plaster bumper stickers all over, write our elected officials till our hands fall off, but they are not listening. So what does that leave us with?

Apparently exercising our 2nd Amendment rights gets their attention. Wearing our sidearms in public creates a furor among the mainstream media and the left. Is that what it takes to get their attention? We should not have to resort to such tactics. Does this lead us to what none of us want to see, but what our founding fathers said must happen in order to save our Republic?

A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy - "A republic," replied the Doctor, "if you can keep it."

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
Patrick Henry, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778

"... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.... And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
Thomas Jefferson


And how does this happen? We cannot count on our military since the Pentagon has been taken over by the left along with George Soros employees. We can't count on the Citizens Militias since they have taken on the cowardly stance of "We are a defensive unit only". We can't count on our republican officials since they have put the responsibility back on their constituency.

Is there one man or one woman with the power, the conviction, and the kahunas to lead us from these dark days? Without leadership rebellion becomes anarchy. Is that what we have to look forward to, tyranny or anarchy?

-TerryCSA


*************



Sarah Palin 2012

SarahPAC believes America's best days are ahead. Our country, founded on conservative principles and the fight for freedom, must confront the challenges of the 21st century with integrity, innovation, and determination.




Support Senator
Jim Demint



Support Joe Wilson
for Congress
The one man with the guts to call Obama a "LIAR"!



Please visit our store



Going Rogue
by Sarah Palin




Arguing With Idiots
by Glenn Beck



Nitro-Pak--The Emergency Preparedness Leader







Copyright©2009 The Conservative Activist
All Rights Reserved