Copyright © 2012 The Conservative Activist. Silver theme by c.bavota & Juan Gordillo. Powered by WordPress.
How To WIN- even if the other side wont admit it!
By, John_Adams.
January 15, 2010
I’ve been doing a lot of talking, listening and debating lately…and, as we all know, there are certain people that are impervious to reason, logic, stats, facts, quotes and plain ol’ common-sense…these people are LIBERALS.
Now, they may claim some other appellation, like, “Moderate”, Centrist, Populist, “Maverick”, Independent, Libertarian…but when I listened to their views, their arguments and asked them questions, well, it turns out that they are nothing but Libs who’ve gone deep undercover. Bogus alternative titles notwithstanding, they ARE LIBERALS.
I’ve decided to share some “Pointers-From-Uncle-Larry” with you all. These, hopefully, will help you to have some understanding of the “mind” of a Lib, HOW to debate one and WIN- even if they wont admit it, AND HOW to NOT get suckered into a lose-lose argument with a LOSER/LIBERAL.
First, let me set forth some “Conservative Maxims”:
1. Be TRUE to WHAT is Right.
Don’t get side-tracked into rabbit-chasing and majoring-on-minor details. Don’t get into a battle over dueling personalities where they say their “quotes are better than your quotes”.
2. It more important to KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT than to argue WHO is right.
Stick with facts, quotes, stats from reliable sources.
3. Don’t argue “bias”. EVERYONE and EVERY SOURCE has a bias. So DON’T argue that.
Again, stick to WHAT IS Right- the facts, details, science, research, quotes…stick with Facts.
4. Don’t let a Leftist sucker into looking for a “neutral” source- THERE AINT ANY.
See “Maxim #3″, every source will have a bias- some are more subtle than others- so don’t fall for the “neutral site/source” trick. INSIST, RATHER, ON SEEKING AND FINDING WHAT IS RIGHT. Stick to FACTS.
Now, having said that let me lay out a current example of just how sources ARE BIASED AND NOT “neutral”.
I’m not any kind of fan of the Rev. Pat Robertson, but when the current flak over the “Haitian pact with the Devil” came up 2-3 days ago my curiosity was piqued…I HAD to investigate.
So I frist did a Google search of “Haitian pact with the Devil”…WHOOOO-WEe! Boy, was The Left ever savaging Pat Robertson! Yikes! Several thousand articles- and growing- each calling him “stupid”, “demented”, “wacko”…and NOT once dealing with whether or not there WAS an ACTUAL pact made. Hmmm, how suspicously predictable of the M.arxist S.talinist M.edia (MSM). :
So I then did a Google search of “Dutty Boukman and the 1791 Haitian Slave Revolt”…WOW! It was like I was researching a completely DIFFERENT topic! I FOUND some 10,000 articles that told and supported the “Hatiian pact with the Devil” as ACCURATE HISTORY, i.e. IT HAPPENED. Here are some of the links that go into detail on the Haitian pact with the Devil:
www.webster.edu/~corbetre/haiti/history/revolution/revolution.htm
www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Dutty_Boukman
www.americandaily.com/article/95
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Haitian_Revolution
Crikey! Even Wikipedia reccounted the same historical facts!!
So, how would I engage a Liberal on this subject?
ONE, I’d STAY AWAY FROM discussing Rev. Pat Roberson, “Maxim #2″.
TWO, I’d reccount the plethora of Historical evidence that says It’s so, “Maxim #1″.
THREE, when they blather non-sensically about “That’s a biased site…I want a neutral site”- that’s when I’d drop “Maxim’s #’s 3 & 4″ on them. BOOM! goes the dynamite!
Now, they can, AND WILL ARGUE ANYWAY…that’s when you stop, look at them and ask “What color is the sky where you live?!!” …and then walk away!
YOU’VE WON! Oh, the LibNut will argue til he drops dead…but WHO CARES? Right is Right. You WON. Walk away whistling…
-John_Adams.


